Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 00:08:58 +0100 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xorg merge and git Message-ID: <4641030A.9090706@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4640492E.6050702@icyb.net.ua> References: <4640492E.6050702@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig24253FDB2413320222C48905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andriy Gapon wrote: > One question: will the ports still be accessible via git after the merg= e > of modular xorg branch ? > I started to like git very much (as a distribution tool), it seems to b= e > much faster than cvsup. Probably not, at least not the xorg branch. I'm hosting this tree on a personal server and while it doesn't bother me to use bandwidth for that, I can't tell it will stay there forever (I'll probably upgrade the server soon, so the tree will be dropped and recreated) so I'm not really comfortable seeing people using it as a day to day replacement for portsnap (which IMHO is much faster, if you're not doing any development). --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committe --------------enig24253FDB2413320222C48905 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGQQMPMxEkbVFH3PQRCiH/AJ90qfmzDKd0g87VVHfriqej66ToNACfddYq 9Y/LhaWFLp5d6y4SEtPKZsE= =6yiK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig24253FDB2413320222C48905--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4641030A.9090706>