From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 08:42:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F183C16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:42:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from fafoe.narf.at (chello212186121237.14.vie.surfer.at [212.186.121.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15DF43D49 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:42:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from wombat.fafoe.narf.at (wombat.fafoe.narf.at [192.168.1.42]) by fafoe.narf.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672843FA9; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:42:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by wombat.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 06C7A1D7; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:42:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:42:44 +0100 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20040109164241.GA596@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> References: <200401081510.39015.linimon@lonesome.com> <20040110012527.S18300@gamplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040110012527.S18300@gamplex.bde.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: Mark Linimon cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: ports/52016: New port: lang/harbour - AClipper-compatible compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:42:52 -0000 On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 02:03:57AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > - at least old standards seem to permit feature test macros to have no > value (they may be empty, or perhaps more bizarre). The "+ 0" in the > above is to handle this case, so that feature test with an empty value > work the same as ones with value 0. [...] > #if _POSIX_SYNCHRONIZED_IO + 0 > 0 Undefined identifiers are replaced with 0 in a #if directive. Maybe some ancient pre-C90 compilers didn't do that, but I think they can be ignored these days. Regards, Stefan Farfeleder