Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:29:18 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Kenneth Culver <culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz> Cc: David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20040628132918.GB1325@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20040627180352.gw4kckgoo8o8os08@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> References: <36u7i8$1mbp58@mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040627021841.GC43456@pasternak.w.lub.pl> <20040627180352.gw4kckgoo8o8os08@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:03:52PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: > So far my athlon 64 3200+ has been one of the coolest running > processors I've ever owned... although I've never used it in a laptop, > my friend's p4 2.8 is running a lot hotter... Yes, current AMD64 CPUs are fairly lower power even without the low-power models. We're seeing 1U dual Opteron boxes running at less then 100F under load. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA4B0sXY6L6fI4GtQRAi24AJ4jwoB6Z8F/Y77li5CxNW6KRrUYAQCgod71 L5Lmk9eWILBJ5UzyUz1i9+A= =Ausl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040628132918.GB1325>