Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:29:18 -0700
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        Kenneth Culver <culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz>
Cc:        David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <20040628132918.GB1325@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
In-Reply-To: <20040627180352.gw4kckgoo8o8os08@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
References:  <36u7i8$1mbp58@mxip19a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040626230026.GA11047@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040627021841.GC43456@pasternak.w.lub.pl> <20040627180352.gw4kckgoo8o8os08@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:03:52PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:

> So far my athlon 64 3200+ has been one of the coolest running
> processors I've ever owned... although I've never used it in a laptop,
> my friend's p4 2.8 is running a lot hotter...

Yes, current AMD64 CPUs are fairly lower power even without the
low-power models.  We're seeing 1U dual Opteron boxes running at less
then 100F under load.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA4B0sXY6L6fI4GtQRAi24AJ4jwoB6Z8F/Y77li5CxNW6KRrUYAQCgod71
L5Lmk9eWILBJ5UzyUz1i9+A=
=Ausl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040628132918.GB1325>