From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 13 23:58:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0418D16A474; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su) Received: from tarc.po.cs.msu.su (tarc.po.cs.msu.su [158.250.16.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A46D43D46; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:58:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su) Received: from tarc.po.cs.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tarc.po.cs.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5E00mSP053634; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:00:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su) Received: (from tarc@localhost) by tarc.po.cs.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k5E00mo1053633; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:00:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from tarc) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:00:48 +0400 From: Tarc To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-ID: <20060614000048.GM22799@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> References: <20060613113151.GC8105@heechee.tobez.org> <200606131037.58401.amistry@am-productions.biz> <20060613234027.GC1074@zaphod.nitro.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060613234027.GC1074@zaphod.nitro.dk> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r581 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xlockmore - serious security issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:58:16 -0000 > FORBIDDEN and a VuXML entry seems in a way a bit overkill to me seems > a bit overkill to me, since it's not really a vulnerability, but I'm > open to input. > > As mentioned by others, xlockmore is fundamentally flawed > wrt. guaranteeing that the screen stays locked in that the > screensavers code can kill the lock, which it should not be able to > happen. > > Has anyone contacted the xlockmore author for comment on this issue? > > One thing we could do right now is to add a message at install time > warning that xlockmore might unlock the screen (a bit like the Pine > warning). > > -- > Simon L. Nielsen about signals: xlockmore catchs SIGINT SIGTERM SIGQUIT SIGSEGV SIGBUS SIGFPE and SIGHUP if compilled with debug. on these signals it lockout your display. But you can lock vt switching -- Best regards, Arseny Nasokin