From owner-freebsd-net Sat May 5 0: 4:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from Spaz.HuntsvilleAL.COM (spaz.huntsvilleal.com [63.147.8.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EFF37B423; Sat, 5 May 2001 00:04:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@catonic.net) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by Spaz.HuntsvilleAL.COM (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f45744g26225; Sat, 5 May 2001 07:04:04 GMT Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 07:04:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Kris Kirby X-Sender: kris@spaz.huntsvilleal.com To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: Wai Chan , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: outgoing traffic load balancing with multiple ISP In-Reply-To: <005a01c0d52e$e3cc41c0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> Message-ID: X-Tech-Support-Email: bofh@catonic.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 4 May 2001, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Wai's biggest problem is that ISP#1 sends all traffic to > ISP#2. While Wai can set up so that both routes are equal > cost to the NOC that ISP#2 is connected to, in effect > he is competing with his own traffic on the link from ISP#2 > to the rest of the world. Ah, static routes. How unfortunate. Well, I don't have much more to add to this one but words. Ted has said what needed to be said. ----- Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. | ------------------------------------------------------- "Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message