From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Mar 8 14:36:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA6E37B405 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:36:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA21017; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:36:09 -0800 Message-ID: <3C893CD9.5090709@owt.com> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 14:36:09 -0800 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NOC Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSup'd Version Issue References: <001101c1c6b2$fd1cdc90$e447a10a@INGIZ3GLLFIGXM> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG NOC wrote: > All, > > > > I just CVSup'd to obtain the latest ports so I could upgrade Openssh > (currently using 3.0.2p1 portable) and I noticed something with the > version number. > > > > When doing a 'make search key' for openssh it still reports it as > 3.0.2p1 but the Makefile in /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable states > that is version 3.1p1. > > > > Is this just a cosmetic issue or will this cause portupgrade to not > upgrade this port to the 3.1p1? > > Does portupgrade actually use the Makefile within the directory to > determine if there is an upgrade available? Search doesn't work unless you do a "portsdb -uU" after every cvsup of ports-all or cd in /usr/ports and do a make index. Kent > > > > Thanks Much! > > > > Chris Kulish > -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message