From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun May  7 01:16:12 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA09826
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 7 May 1995 01:16:12 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA09802
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 7 May 1995 01:16:10 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id BAA00648; Sun, 7 May 1995 01:19:05 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id BAA00504; Sun, 7 May 1995 01:16:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199505070816.BAA00504@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
cc: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS-L <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Heavy HTTPD serving on 2.0-950412 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 07 May 95 16:06:45 +0800."
             <Pine.BSI.3.91.950506172920.8049B-100000@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Sun, 07 May 1995 01:14:13 -0700
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>haven't rebooted since then).  Is one mbuf needed per network connection,
>in general?  Netstat showed around 500 open tcp connections during the
>test (most in TIME_WAIT, mind you).

   One mbuf, but probably not an mbuf cluster...the real answer is I don't
know - it depends on whatever the network code decides to allocate, and this
may not even be very consistent.

-DG