Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Jun 2008 22:33:30 -0700
From:      Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
To:        FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3
Message-ID:  <C69AC20A-225C-478D-B0C8-B2F018B555C6@netconsonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <484736E0.6090004@samsco.org>
References:  <9B7FE91B-9C2E-4732-866C-930AC6022A40@netconsonance.com> <4846E637.9080101@samsco.org> <BFF61274-C192-4361-9DEB-93DED2E02CA7@netconsonance.com> <48472DB6.5030909@samsco.org> <6010676B-91B0-4AF8-ACF8-039A59B29331@netconsonance.com> <484736E0.6090004@samsco.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm going to be offline for a week starting now, so please don't read  
my lack of answers as anything other than "out of town".  Sorry.

For clarity:  I'm not asking for anyone to fix anything.  I honestly  
believe most developers are addressing problems as fast as they can.   
I'd help them in any way I could.

I am suggesting that given that the current bug list for 6.3-RELEASE  
is both (a) too large and (b) breaks things that work fine in 6.2 ...  
that I think pushing 6.2 (the real stable release) into EoL is a bit  
rushed.  I sympathize with the development costs of maintaining old  
versions.  Again, I will help in any way I can.

On my return next week I would happily build and provide 6.3-RELEASE  
systems for any developer who needs a test environment for reported  
bugs that affect hardware I have in my possession.  Free boxes, free  
bandwidth, power, etc.  No problem.  Free my time in whatever way I  
can help.

But until such time as the current bug list for 6.3 hardware reduces  
to somewhere less than 100% likelyhood of experiencing failures after  
an upgrade, there's just no way I can take our production environment  
forward.  Going "bravely forward" to guaranteed failure isn't a great  
way to enjoy your job :-(  Which means I'll be doing our security  
patches by hand.   Because it may be time intensive, but it's less  
likely to cause a production failure.

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C69AC20A-225C-478D-B0C8-B2F018B555C6>