From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Thu Aug 2 02:42:22 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3733D10506F4; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 02:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BC193DF2; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 02:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id w722gFU3075087 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Aug 2018 19:42:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132] claimed to be yv.noip.me Subject: Re: svn commit: r476184 - in head: . Mk cad/qcad comms/linrad databases/p5-DBIx-Class-IntrospectableM2M devel/libcfg devel/p5-Class-Method-Modifiers-Fast devel/p5-DateTime-Format-DateParse devel/py-exp... To: Adam Weinberger Cc: adamw@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201808011633.w71GXBEr055314@repo.freebsd.org> <96703e81-5e5b-b58d-9e58-4ff612c0dfb7@rawbw.com> From: Yuri Message-ID: <1fc5e726-d26e-5e70-6f55-0b52ffa86c14@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 19:42:14 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:42:22 -0000 On 8/1/18 7:28 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote: > What is it exactly that you're arguing in favour of here? It's not in favor of anything, the change itself is still ok, just the explanation was wrong. They are not exactly the same thing, but they aren't opposites of each other either. Rather, they are much closer to being the same thing than not. Yuri