From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 20:31:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB7716A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from bigwoop.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD27643D48 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by bigwoop.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C8E7A423; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42A75591.7080502@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:31:13 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050423 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <864qc9mgqc.fsf@xps.des.no> <42A73773.1040508@elischer.org> <86ll5ksk44.fsf@xps.des.no> <42A75303.2090203@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <42A75303.2090203@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Retiring static libpam support X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 20:31:14 -0000 adding more to my revious mail.. Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > >> Julian Elischer writes: >> >> >>> I gues it would be ok if the basic binary is static and the PAM >>> modules are loaded using dlopen. >>> >> >> >> You can't load dynamic objects from a static binary. It doesn't have >> a working dlopen() (since dlopen() is implemented by the run-time >> loader), and even if it did, there is no relocation table there to >> resolve dependencies in the dynamic object. >> >> > > so basically that would screw us. Or force us to abandon static linking of apps, which might be an OK decision, but basically I think it's kind of the thin edge of the wedge for fully desupporting all static binaries. if nothing that does authentication can be static then there is no such thing any more as a fully static system and one might as well just not bother. > >> DES >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"