Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:17:34 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Chris Casey <chriss@phys.ksu.edu> Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ccc Message-ID: <20010607101734.A93605@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96L.1010606210051.537H-100000@schottky.phys.ksu.edu>; from chriss@phys.ksu.edu on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:55:12AM -0500 References: <20010606114751.A77329@hub.freebsd.org> <Pine.SOL.3.96L.1010606210051.537H-100000@schottky.phys.ksu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:55:12AM -0500, Chris Casey wrote: > /compat/linux/usr/lib/libfor.so: undefined reference to `getenv@GLIBC_2.0' I suspected this means Compaq has now moved to supporting RH 7.0, rather than RH 6.2. Our AlphaLinux compat code is only approved for RH 6.2 compatibility. Andrew told me that Compaq made this official at http://www.compaq.com/fortran/linux/ "The current version is 1.1.0, which supports most current Linux Alpha distributions, including RedHat 7.0 and SuSE 7.0. The older version, 1.0.2, is available for users still running RedHat 5.2 or similar distributions." I went to look at it and saw at http://www.compaq.com/fortran/linux/download-102.html you can still get their [older] fortran90 for RH 6.2. I would highly, highly suggest working first with the 1.0.2 compiler to get it to produce native FreeBSD binaries. You will not have these symbol problems you are seeing because the linux_base port only installs the RH 6.2 libs. (yes RH seriously screwed the pooch by not bumping their shlib versions when they added symboling w/RH 7.0) Once we get 1.0.2 working, we can attach the 1.1.0 compiler. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010607101734.A93605>