From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Dec 23 19:30:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350B2C8D157 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9265D79 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cKVXW-0001Vg-1x; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 22:30:02 +0300 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 22:30:02 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Willem Jan Withagen Cc: Adrian Chadd , Konstantin Belousov , freebsd-current Subject: Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD Message-ID: <20161223193001.GC37118@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20161214190349.GJ94325@kib.kiev.ua> <20161215105118.GK98176@zxy.spb.ru> <20161215123330.GQ94325@kib.kiev.ua> <20161215131624.GL98176@zxy.spb.ru> <20161215135656.GS94325@kib.kiev.ua> <20161215224500.GM98176@zxy.spb.ru> <3792b7ea-0818-b358-4091-d78c3214a09c@digiware.nl> <20161223132627.GA37153@zxy.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:30:06 -0000 On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 08:16:39PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > On 23-12-2016 14:26, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 09:26:02PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > > > >> On 16-12-2016 00:57, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >>> heh, an updated BIOS that solves the problem will solve the problem. :) > >>> > >>> I think you have enough information to provide to supermicro. Ie, > >>> "SMAP says X, when physical memory pages at addresses X are accessed, > >>> they don't behave like memory, maybe something is wrong". > >>> > >>> All I can think of is some hack to add a blacklist for that region so > >>> you can boot the unit. But it makes me wonder what else is going on. > >> > >> I have an X10DRL-iT with 256Gb and 2* 2630V4 available for testing until > >> begin January. Started it on 11-RELEASE and upgraded to 12-CURRENT of > >> 20-12-2016. > >> Boots just fine, and seems to run OKE. > >> > >> If anything useful to test, just let me know. > > > > For touch issuse you must enable in BIOS both NUMA and Memory > > Interleave below 4G. > > Numa was already on, but I cannot find the Memory Interleave option. for X10DRi: Advanced/Chipset Config/North Bridge/Memory Config/Socket Interleave below 4G