Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:50:45 +0200 From: Jonathan McKeown <j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?) Message-ID: <201207100850.45861.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> In-Reply-To: <4FFB44BA.3040208@FreeBSD.org> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <201207091533.08963.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <4FFB44BA.3040208@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 09 July 2012 22:53:14 Doug Barton wrote: > > We get it, change is hard. No, that isn't what I said at all. I was pointing out that there's some inconsistency between arguing that we need to make things more predictable for new users, while simultaneously arguing that we should remove the usual tools for doing dns lookups (note, I was talking about the BIND tools, not the whole of BIND, although I gather from other responses in the thread that they're inextricably linked).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201207100850.45861.j.mckeown>