Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:22:19 +0300 From: George Liaskos <geo.liaskos@gmail.com> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>, chromium@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92 Message-ID: <CANcjpOA4e-xXt1hz=H3y62Ys0Qa8iYT%2B2vSYgAYGePOaXsx5Pw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E9D7BA9.2070901@yandex.ru> References: <CANcjpOD9PsunPiqG1yRaENtOqVdBhuOV_Fj3GB0zAP=jNCXtLw@mail.gmail.com> <CANcjpOAoA4c-jAbdBWLnSZuDAkBjPhyntOOuZrBJbm4iemYOwA@mail.gmail.com> <20111018114830.GA25714@freebsd.org> <CANcjpOBTYexh5f5fACGJjWHU6RojBwMOW_yPJMA85CLeY-an-Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E9D7BA9.2070901@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes, all is fine here. And i didn't used libtool-fixed and UNAME_r hack for > building. Using stock gcc and default options (CODECS,GCONF). Chromium does not need any hack to compile, what i don't know is the state of devel/google-perftools on CURRENT. Compiling a jail right now.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANcjpOA4e-xXt1hz=H3y62Ys0Qa8iYT%2B2vSYgAYGePOaXsx5Pw>