From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 16:42:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3852216A405 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 16:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdh_lists@yahoo.com) Received: from web56808.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56808.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B73FC13C48A for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 16:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdh_lists@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 8469 invoked by uid 60001); 16 May 2007 16:15:39 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=I7/dUuFxvnA+kKobHghq2en4dYCqOn0f4Uze0VKjtK4kvkDwTxaWTntJbTSJTsfWBPBJwyzMXDOofhKOD6RkYIjdPzez7V14qe618tytNZnVGZ3BK2uZBQcOcONKvaOvOhYV6IINkHzxKsF/HxJ4I87TnjZiQi3xPeXfAloIFYY=; X-YMail-OSG: Ssyh5lAVM1lbhwVdcntglqTGXL1YTZhS1o4oeSDQE1LFwpLR6wlLabr4Mx6bJNQs2e2yzR66X36YYVY2xpGLvT4G3bKdkO3K7WFlS6uaipIkXvlRtDUA6Sx66izJNCcxhVAaJ9ON_U2giw0- Received: from [71.61.81.160] by web56808.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2007 09:15:39 PDT Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:15:39 -0700 (PDT) From: mdh To: Nenhum_de_Nos , freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4956a5e50705151012i193dab3bx5ec333b4d5cda8b2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <171814.7281.qm@web56808.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: binary problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:42:20 -0000 There was an issue in GNU binutils on SPARC64 some years back (I remember being one of the original reporters of the issue back when 6.0 had just gone -R). You may want to check list archives/etc for the necessary patches (there was a PR, too), and compare your core files with gdb to the issues. It seems odd the fixes weren't incorporated into 6.2, so I'm not sure - if you still have problems, post some backtraces and I'll see if we can't figure out what's up. Best of luck, Matt. --- Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > hail, > > I've a sunblade 150 that can't do anything apart > being a server :( > FreeBSD is the most stable desktop OS I've tried, I > don't want to run > SunOS, and not tried OpenBSD as desktop in it. But > there is something > that allways anoyes me, everytime the system is ok > to be used things ( > most of the time, firefox) begin to give me core > dumps :( > > I've installed the latest -STABLE, then csup'ed and > compiled to the > newestby the time: > > [matheus@sunblade /usr/home/matheus]$ uname -a > FreeBSD sunblade 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: > Mon Apr 23 13:44:24 > BRT 2007 > root@sunblade:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Blade sparc64 > [matheus@sunblade /usr/home/matheus]$ > > I can update it to whatever branch is needed, I just > need to make it a > GDM+Gnome Desktop. X is fine now. > > this is seen since 6.1R days. I've tested two > different 150's, changed > memory and HD's. I've used precompiled firefox's, > ports build ones, > and everytime this happens :( > > if anyone has any clues ... > > thanks > > matheus > > -- > We will call you cygnus, > The God of balance you shall be > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather