From owner-freebsd-current  Fri May 23 14:11:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA16680
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 23 May 1997 14:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ian.broken.net (R-ddo.resnet.ucsb.edu [128.111.120.207])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA16675
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 23 May 1997 14:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from ian@localhost) by ian.broken.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) id OAA25461; Fri, 23 May 1997 14:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <XFMail.970523141109.ian@ian.broken.net>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.1 [p0] on FreeBSD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19970523224300.LX25394@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 14:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ian Struble <ian@ian.broken.net>
To: (Joerg Wunsch) <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Subject: Re: cd9660 w/ Joliet extensions
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On 23-May-97 J Wunsch wrote:
>As Ian Struble wrote:
>
>> This is probably a bit premature, but is anyone working on support for
>> Microsoft's Joliet cd9660 extensions?
>
>I would prefer mickeysoft using RR. :-]

Me too.  I was just reading about Joliet and wondering why they didn't.  I
guess it is just the usual 'not invented here syndrome'...