From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov  3 14:17:18 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D91191
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Nov 2012 14:17:18 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (feld.me [66.170.3.2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FCF8FC08
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Nov 2012 14:17:18 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
 s=blargle; 
 h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
 bh=MJpGleEWwmcfr8linwh9C1omysUAPbgADpla1GwGnaY=; 
 b=h8r/vt5nVVuZ9ALwxEFLqcXWJUMtU6pn5YyzN0ab2r4VwohDapGyWgTfCxBBnpydUAJZrdMPCeMAScvIQNO8LFEaXGjd5weCM7sH8YdK7dwffEfJrXr8B/trWCGCpJB8;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
 by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <feld@feld.me>)
 id 1TUeXE-000H95-0g; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 09:17:17 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
 with esmtpa id 1351952230-65253-65252/5/16; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 14:17:10
 +0000
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:17:52 -0500
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
To: Alie Tan <alie@affle.com>
Subject: Re: DragonFly vs FreeBSD scheduler
Message-Id: <20121103091752.0000797f@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <CANuCnH9b20NxDpmzPdE2tdEFCTx7a4u_TvvEJNc0J4yCbDm+iw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANuCnH9b20NxDpmzPdE2tdEFCTx7a4u_TvvEJNc0J4yCbDm+iw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:17:18 -0000

On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:18:55 +0800
Alie Tan <alie@affle.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> No offence, just curious about scheduler and its functionality.
>=20
> What is the different between this two that makes FreeBSD performance =
far
> behind DragonFly BSD? http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release32/
>=20

I don't have any details but I do know that Dragonfly has been putting a =
lot of work into their scheduler. Hopefully some of that will trickle =
back our way.