From owner-freebsd-fs  Sat Aug 24 21:46:08 1996
Return-Path: owner-fs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA04053
          for fs-outgoing; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 21:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA04031;
          Sat, 24 Aug 1996 21:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.7.5/8.6.9) id XAA05829; Sat, 24 Aug 1996 23:45:53 -0500 (EST)
From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Message-Id: <199608250445.XAA05829@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: The VIVA file system (fwd)
To: sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au (Stephen Hocking)
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 23:45:53 -0500 (EST)
Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199608250335.DAA21536@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au> from "Stephen Hocking" at Aug 25, 96 03:35:19 am
Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-fs@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>
> Anybody have opinions on this vs LFS? Are we still waiting for the Lite-2
> stuff, before LFS can go in?
> 
Looks interesting, but LFS is also.  Some of the improvements will appear
when we get our implementation of properly delayed writes working for
UFS.  I am sure that someone will take-on LFS when Lite-2 stuff goes
in, even I might (shiver :-)).

John