From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 11 17:09:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35AF16A400; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao04.cox.net (eastrmmtao04.cox.net [68.230.240.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A0643D45; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:09:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([68.14.59.177]) by eastrmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060411170910.GPZ19943.eastrmmtao04.cox.net@serene.no-ip.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:09:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k3BH8vpY048839; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:08:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:08:51 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: John Baldwin Message-Id: <20060411120851.ce0e75fb.conrads@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <200604101528.31794.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20060329020527.f8f087a4.conrads@cox.net> <200604031152.27109.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060410132427.3d01417b.conrads@cox.net> <200604101528.31794.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; amd64-unknown-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bms@spc.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device atpic to be deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:09:18 -0000 On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:28:29 -0400 John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 10 April 2006 14:24, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > > Well, some testing with my latest STABLE source update (Fri, Apr 7) > > exhibits the same problems. > > > > I can boot the kernel and mount root OK with or without ACPI enabled > > (via the loader tunable hint.acpi.0.disabled), but not without > > atpic. > > > > I can even boot OK without "device acpi" compiled into the kernel > > explicitly (and with no acpi module, either, of course, as this > > doesn't get built under amd64), but without atpic and the associated > > ACPI bits it pulls in, it's a definite show-stopper. > > > > Another interesting side effect I've noticed is that without acpi, > > the built-in nVidia sound chip (with the snd_ich driver compiled > > in) is not recognized either. > > I've lost the context.. Can you provide a verbose dmesg both with > and without 'device atpic'? Basically, the problem is that, without device atpic, I can't mount root, so it's impossible as well to obtain a dmesg listing for you in that case. I'll mail a listing (with atpic, of course) later today. Got an appointment to get ready for at the moment. Thanks. -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"