From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Dec 20 00:41:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA29516
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 00:41:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA29508;
          Sat, 20 Dec 1997 00:41:08 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.6.9) id TAA23072; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 19:39:50 +1100
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 19:39:50 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199712200839.TAA23072@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: grog@lemis.com, julian@whistle.com
Subject: Re: Bruce vandalism again
Cc: bde@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>I agree.  This appears to be a seriously retrograde step.  Bruce, why?

I'm just enforcing this part of style(9):

     Only use the __P macro from the include file <sys/cdefs.h> if the source
     file in general is (to be) compilable with a K&R Old testament compiler.
     Use of the __P macro in new code is discouraged, although modifications
     to existing files should be consistent with that file's conventions.

     In general code can be considered ``new code'' when it makes up about 50%
     or more of the file[s] involved.  This is enough to break precedents in
     the existing code and use the current style guidelines.

Bruce