Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:43:51 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: vsevolod@highsecure.ru Subject: Re: USE_X11_PREFIX... when to use? Message-ID: <200506291544.00008.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050629101543.GE57144@carrick.bishnet.net> References: <20050629101543.GE57144@carrick.bishnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart5226703.C0L2Xn3Hj8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 29. June 2005 12:15, Tim Bishop wrote: > Vsevolod has pointed me a the following cvs-all discussion: > > http://www.monkey.org/freebsd/archive/freebsd-cvs-all/200506/msg02895.html > > Now, I'm not trying to debate what the documentation says, but clearly > there does seem to be some issue over where ports (like gnubiff below) > should go. > > When doing gnubiff I used USE_X11_PREFIX because it seemed to be the > normal thing to do. But maybe that's not the right thing? It's not, but since gnubiff uses GNOME and gtk, it's excusable to put it in= =20 there (you'd probably have to cut many corners to make it live elsewhere an= d=20 work right). > IMHO the right=20 > thing to do isn't to end up with X-based ports splattered across the > local and X11R6 prefix=20 That's already the case. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart5226703.C0L2Xn3Hj8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCwqWfXhc68WspdLARAlamAJ9l4NUxzviLafrJYlCL1iZIPl2onwCeOP9E cVeOSkI5FGjSU6sbKPKlRJs= =T9EC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5226703.C0L2Xn3Hj8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506291544.00008.lofi>