Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:22:53 -0500
From:      "Mikhail Evstiounin" <evstiounin@adelphia.net>
To:        "Juha Saarinen" <juha@saarinen.org>, "Mike Tancsa" <mike@sentex.net>
Cc:        <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Not such good networking performance with FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <001901bf4774$d768a0c0$d3353018@evstiouninadelphia.net.pit.adelphia.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oops, sorry, didn's see this letter - skip my previous posting.
-----Original Message-----
From: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org>
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc: questions@freebsd.org <questions@freebsd.org>
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 10:39 PM
Subject: RE: Not such good networking performance with FreeBSD


>>
>> See if there are any errors in the switch on the port that FreeBSD is
>> attached to.  I seem to recall reading some issues about this particular
>> card.  You might try explicitly forcing the duplex to either half or full
>> and seeing how that effects performance. The main thing is for the card
and
>> switch to agree on the settings. Dont trust auto-neg, as most of the
times
>> I have found it not to work properly. You should be able to tell by just
>> doing some transfers from one machine to another on your LAN.
>
>Unfortunately, it's an unmanaged switch, so I can't get anything useful
>out of it like port stats and diags.
>
>I get full speed ftp transfers (~1MBps, the switch has only one 100Mbps
>port, the rest are 10Mbps) at the moment, but will try the FD thing as
>well.
>
>I was just trying to figure out how to explicitly force the card into
>full-duplex... ifconfig ??
>
>> Yes. If the box is going to act as a router.
>
>Ahh.. thanks. I'm using the box as a caching http proxy, email, ftp, Web,
>ssh etc. server, but I suppose as it only has the one network interface,
>it isn't doing much routing at the moment.
>
>>
>> You should not have to change any of those values. The default should
give
>> you performance adequate to saturate a 10BaseT LAN given minimal
sufficient
>> hardware.
>
>I'm in New Zealand, and much of this country's Internet connectivity comes
>via satellite. RTTs to hosts outside NZ range from 200ms if I'm lucky, to
>350ms and higher typically. I've found that increasing the TCP receive
>buffers on Linux, WinNT and Win98 make a huge difference in this
>situation.
>
>Cheers,
>
>-- Juha
>
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001901bf4774$d768a0c0$d3353018>