From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 18:21:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D2316A419; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD2513C4E8; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([85.172.12.83]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id l76HjMWW038884; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 21:45:32 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from bsam@localhost) by bsam.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l76HjgEx001222; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 21:45:42 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: bsam.ru: bsam set sender to bsam@ipt.ru using -f To: Alexander Leidinger References: <45722684@bsam.ru> <20070806093303.axopv21aw0ckowco@webmail.leidinger.net> <20070806090422.GA47161@freebsd.org> <20070806114913.vwjsryyko4kgo4g8@webmail.leidinger.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:45:42 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20070806114913.vwjsryyko4kgo4g8@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Mon\, 06 Aug 2007 11\:49\:13 +0200") Message-ID: <54644073@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, Roman Divacky , freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Is it safe to change compat.linux.osrelease inside a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:21:17 -0000 On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:49:13 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Roman Divacky (from Mon, 6 Aug 2007 > 11:04:22 +0200): > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:33:03AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> Quoting Boris Samorodov (from Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:00:35 > >> +0400): > >> >I'm porting some Fedora Core 6 applications. Since the FreeBSD > >> >package of a FC6 port should be build with non-default > >> >compat.linux.osrelease and pointyhat is using jails to create > >> >packages, here is the question at the Subject. > >> > > >> >I know it _may_ be changed (I've tried and succeeded). Can someone > >> >say that it's quite OK to do so (without bad effects to jail/host)? > >> >Sure I ask about -CURRENT. > >> > >> Roman did some work to make this a per-jail feature. I haven't seen > >> any obvious stuff in the code which would make using this a bad idea. > >> So: there are no known side-effects to use this in a jail. > > > > I didnt do anything.. this has always been per-jail attribute :) > Yes. Sorry for not being clear. You did the right work from the > beginning to make the sysctl per jail instead of making it a global > property of the system. And the feature which is protected by this > sysctl should be able to work correctly for the use case. Got it, thanks. WBR -- bsam