From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 17:39:02 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A1316A419 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:39:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C172713C45A for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:39:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 18446 invoked by uid 399); 25 Jul 2007 17:39:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 25 Jul 2007 17:39:01 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <46A78AB3.9090805@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:38:59 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland References: <01e101c7cecb$380e6960$b6db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <01e101c7cecb$380e6960$b6db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bind exploit, patch expected? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:39:02 -0000 Steven Hartland wrote: > I assume the security team are already working on this but > cant hurt to ask: Before you ask questions on a public list it's generally considered polite to do a little checking yourself, especially in an open source project. As Mike pointed out, the secteam had already addressed this issue on -security, and I had already followed up in detail regarding the upgrade plans. In addition, at the time you posted the updates had all been done in the ports, HEAD (-current), and RELENG_[56] (5 and 6-stable). In any case, it's good that you're on top of your security announcements, and I'm glad to say that this time anyway we're one step ahead. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection