Date: 03 Aug 2002 12:15:43 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE vs. GNOME || GNOME vs. KDE Message-ID: <87eldfdfsw.fsf@pooh.int> In-Reply-To: <20020803173449.A340@fishballoon.dyndns.org> References: <001c01c23b06$3f9e0b80$6901a8c0@SURVIVAL> <20020803173449.A340@fishballoon.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 2002-08-03T16:34:49Z, Scott Mitchell <scott.mitchell@mail.com> writes: > KDE & Gnome are both pretty heavyweight -- I'll hazard a guess and say > that anything much less than a 700MHz machine with 256MB of RAM and a > decent graphics adapter won't really be up to the task of running them. I was using a P-II/450 up until a couple of months ago, and only grew tired of it because Nautilus was just unbearable (but cool enough that I wanted to try to us it). I also had 768MB of RAM and a Geforce2, so I'd agree with at least 2/3 of your statement. -- Kirk Strauser The Strauser Group - http://www.strausergroup.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87eldfdfsw.fsf>