From owner-freebsd-arch  Sun Jul  9 11:15:19 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9731E37B94B
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun,  9 Jul 2000 11:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net)
Received: from localhost (bsdx@localhost)
	by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA29332;
	Sun, 9 Jul 2000 14:12:42 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net)
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 14:12:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>,
	Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: making the snoop device loadable. 
In-Reply-To: <17323.963164984@critter.freebsd.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007091411480.407-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, 9 Jul 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>
>>If this change goes in, what do you do if you wish not to have snooping
>>capable through the snp device and do not wish to lock unneccessary parts
>>of the system down with securelevel?
>
>You do the same as before:  Hold on tight to your root password.

I dont like kernel changes that make the kernel do less babysitting and me
more.  Tough, I guess.  



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message