From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 1 10: 8:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.campbell-mithun.com (Mercury.campbell-mithun.com [192.159.32.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55C637B840; Mon, 1 May 2000 10:08:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from marlowe (Marlowe.campbell-mithun.com [192.159.32.184]) by mercury.campbell-mithun.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA13153; Mon, 1 May 2000 12:08:22 -0500 Message-ID: <00b901bfb38f$e4625cd0$b8209fc0@marlowe> From: "Shawn Barnhart" To: "Alfred Perlstein" Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" , References: <009b01bfb389$96546cf0$b8209fc0@marlowe> <20000501101044.F24573@fw.wintelcom.net> Subject: Re: stop complaining about x11 please (was: Re: Why does PORTS SUCK so BADLY!?) Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 12:08:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alfred Perlstein" | NO_X11=YES in /etc/make.conf ? Is this a suggestion for future improvement or a works-right-now suggestion? If its the latter, its not documented in my /etc/make.conf. | However this doesn't seem to be a system wide thing. | | There's a sort of problem here, I think NO_X11 needs three options | | 1) don't build anything requiring X11 | 2) build the thing without X11 if possible | 3) grab X11 if needed | | Even if 2 and 3 where made somehow ports-system-wide that would be | really nifty. I agree. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message