From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 26 05:38:40 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCC116A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:38:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from tenebras.com (graystone.tenebras.com [216.27.179.139])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4413543D5A
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:38:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ducatista@camber-thrust.net)
Received: (qmail 73911 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2005 05:38:37 -0000
Received: from grayair.tenebras.com (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (192.168.188.166)
  by hospital.tenebras.com with SMTP; 26 Jan 2005 05:38:37 -0000
Message-ID: <41F72CDC.7010900@camber-thrust.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:38:36 -0800
From: Michael Sierchio <ducatista@camber-thrust.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
References: <41F6F431.6060005@tenebras.com>
	<1106704507.16118.14.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <1106704507.16118.14.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: ports@freebsd.org
cc: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
cc: lioux@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: qmail-1.03_3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:38:40 -0000

Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:

> Actually, if k is less than or equal to i and cmds.s[k-1] is a tab, then
> the first bit of code evaluates to true while the second evaluates to
> false.  I haven't looked at the rest of the code, but those statements
> are semantically different, and I think the second is more correct.

This is annoying me -- WTF would ANYONE make a claim for the existence
of a defect without demonstrating the error with the input and output?

The only bug is in misreading code, not the code.

- Michael