From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 27 18:31:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA01989 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 18:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA01918 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 1997 18:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.org (dev.lan.awfulhak.org [10.0.1.5]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA13303; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 02:15:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from dev.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA07484; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 02:15:23 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199707280115.CAA07484@awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0delta 6/3/97 To: Dan Janowski cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, kernel@acromail.ml.org, danny@panda.hilink.com.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw divert, transparent proxy In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 27 Jul 1997 11:55:58 EDT." <199707271555.LAA00845@fnur.3skel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 02:15:23 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > There seems to be some agreement that using divert > sockets is the way to go, but I still am at a loss > for any examples using the mechanism. Does anyone > have any code, snippet or functional, that utilizes > the interface? Reading the kernel code is only a > step away, but an example, even a simple one, would > help. See /usr/src/usr.sbin/natd/samples/natd.test. If you don't run -current, it's available on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD- current/src..... > Dan > -- Brian , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....