From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 19:26:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mandree.no-ip.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2452CDB; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B87E23CEED; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:26:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <54343E60.7050208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 21:26:24 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: 11-CURRENT redports builders miscompiling? (was: svn commit: r370388 - in head: devel/e2fsprogs-libss misc/e2fsprogs-libblkid misc/e2fsprogs-libuuid sysutils/e2fsprogs sysutils/e2fsprogs/files) References: <201410071915.s97JFrQo061043@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201410071915.s97JFrQo061043@svn.freebsd.org> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <201410071915.s97JFrQo061043@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:26:27 -0000 Greetings, I have just updated sysutils/e2fsprogs and its slave ports(*), and test drove them on redports. The self-test suite is failing on 11-CURRENT i386 and amd64, but not on 10 or older releases. 11-amd64: https://redports.org/buildarchive/20141007190638-31576 11-i386: https://redports.org/buildarchive/20141007185700-4151 I am now wondering - if there are issues with the toolchain on 11 that causes miscompilation, or - whether 11 is misbehaving on redports, or - if e2fsprogs has code bugs that don't show on older toolchains. Any insights into the 11-CURRENT tool chain quality? Thanks. (*) as of SVN ports revision 370388. Cheers, Matthias