From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 22 08:46:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12B11065686; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DF78FC0A; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBF38D.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.243.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p7M8kmFd089075; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:46:49 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7M8kawP002716; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:46:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7M8k10v002452; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:46:07 GMT (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201108220846.p7M8k10v002452@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Mark Linimon From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:40:05 CDT." <20110822014005.GA1910@lonesome.com> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:46:01 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ben@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp , Chris Rees Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:46:51 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:57:17AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > I'd question _why_ valuable people like you & Chris would allow > > your time to be distracted merely to try to get repair run time > > capability of a port. > > I haven't spent any time on this port. I'm just trying to reply to > traffic on the mailing list. > > Most of the time is spent on maintaining the package building cluster. > In general I'm happier to work on infrastructure patches than individual > ports. Great. Thanks. > But I do try to keep up with the mailing lists, and, in this case, > lend my support to the effort that others are doing to clean up bitrot. > > I hope you can accept that it looks to me as though there are honest > differences of opinion about what shape this port is in. Yes, seems so. > I personally > have no stake in it. Ditto. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.