From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org  Thu Jun  9 18:31:25 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6021B70FBD
 for <freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  9 Jun 2016 18:31:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16E21180
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2016 18:31:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id CD0C2B70FBC; Thu,  9 Jun 2016 18:31:25 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB64B70FBB
 for <stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2016 18:31:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A911E117E
 for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2016 18:31:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2])
 by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7A133C1E;
 Thu,  9 Jun 2016 14:31:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147)
 id C135839828; Thu,  9 Jun 2016 14:31:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org,  Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=
 <des@des.no>,  krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: unbound and ntp issuse
References: <20160602122727.GB75625@zxy.spb.ru> <86pors7cba.fsf@desk.des.no>
 <20160608094859.GH75625@zxy.spb.ru>
 <CALfReyes2H4e86B8gUfPEui8ivqWuaMDzcMa_=4BQorvvTam9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160609080440.GR75630@zxy.spb.ru>
 <CALfReycwtf9eiVDRLpqW==fYNWfaoeERfh8tFg=LKaiXWGC3ig@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160609133739.GV75630@zxy.spb.ru> <44r3c68od2.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
 <20160609140209.GW75630@zxy.spb.ru>
Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 14:31:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160609140209.GW75630@zxy.spb.ru> (Slawa Olhovchenkov's message
 of "Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:02:09 +0300")
Message-ID: <44mvmu8b9m.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 18:31:26 -0000

Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 09:48:25AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> writes:
>> 
>> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:29:09PM +0100, krad wrote:
>> >
>> >> I doubt that will happen as you are asking to pollute every release
>> >> installation for an edge condition when  there is numerous work arounds
>> >> that would be acceptable to most.   eg two lines in rc.conf will fix the
>> >> issue.
>> >
>> > This manual editing will be required by every install on RPi, for
>> > example.
>> 
>> No, it won't. Most people will just give the system a valid DNS
>> configuration, and the clock will not be an issue.
>
> What invalid in my DNS configuration?

You said that you configured 127.0.0.1 as your DNS server. You didn't
say how (or rather where) you did that, but if you had used the address
of a working upstream recursive server, I suspect there wouldn't have
been any problem.