Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:29:57 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: clsung@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to bootstrap libtool? Message-ID: <20110210002957.12a6cc76@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <E284419D-4469-451E-BC27-AE3220486FBC@mac.com> References: <4D52D798.5020204@secnap.com> <C7CE8A43-E22F-4F03-8C29-E08F8A2A40BB@mac.com> <4D52DE76.2050208@secnap.com> <7CA2236E-503C-4456-9516-DD7806FDDF9E@mac.com> <4D52E793.7000605@secnap.com> <E284419D-4469-451E-BC27-AE3220486FBC@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/LDZZMyMDSUV3aA_+E12nzRU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:40:18 -0800 Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> wrote: > On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > >> The problem with !=3D is that is is evaluated in a subshell > >> regardless of whether the results are needed, and it happens while > >> the Makefile is first being read, before it tries to figure out > >> which targets need to be processed. =20 Hence this adds a lot of time for each processing, like make index. > >> This is why setting libnet in > >> BUILD_DEPENDS isn't being processed until after these commands are > >> run (or fail to run, as above). > >=20 > > which is useless information to me. don't know why, been doing > > freebsd for 10 years, been a port maintainer for.. ? 4? 5? don't > > remember. > >=20 > > still that is useless information, and doesn't make any sense. > >=20 > > doesn't tell me what,why, how, or when to replace what lines with > > what alternatives. > >=20 > > yes, I can hard code it, but I don't really understand what those > > (inherited lines) actually do. >=20 > OK. If you don't understand make, and you aren't willing to look at > the documentation, then it's hardly surprising that you're having > problems figuring things out. >=20 > Engineers solve problems. Managers create problems. > Senior management exists to decide *which* problems management ought > to create. >=20 > (In this particular case, it seems like you ought to delegate the > problem to an engineer who has the knowledge to solve it. If I get > some free time, I'll see what I can do, otherwise someone else might > volunteer....) I hope the one that committed the last Makefile version (CC'ed) will have the time to help. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/LDZZMyMDSUV3aA_+E12nzRU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk1TFWsACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeW1xgCfcZJ53ksfiMjEyodyCmEZ9CqX SLAAoK4tQP0FHEmamEiJ8iNDiXcNpbfO =AjJv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/LDZZMyMDSUV3aA_+E12nzRU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110210002957.12a6cc76>