From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Jul 8 9:34:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from alpha.netaccess.on.ca (alpha.netaccess.on.ca [199.243.225.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640EC14D41 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:34:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rob@ControlQ.com) Received: from fatlady.controlq.com (dial197.nas.net [199.243.225.197]) by alpha.netaccess.on.ca (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id MAA21136; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:34:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:34:57 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert S. Sciuk" To: Cosmic 665 Cc: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP comparisons In-Reply-To: <19990708162724.16604.qmail@hotmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Cosmic 665 wrote: > NO!!!!! FreeBSD is ahead... maybe behind a little... either way, we kick > linux's A$$ > > > p.s. I gave a copy of 3.0 to a friend of mine to compare between linux & > FreeBSD on SMP and maybe even NT. I'll be hearing back from him on thouse > results. > I think we're not where we should be ... what with the GreatBigLock in the Kernel ... however, I've seen some -smp traffic which leads me to believe some very talented individuals are working to rectify this situation ... then FreeBSD should kick some proverbial butt 8-). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message