From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 5 04:34:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88EC73AD for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 04:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from harbor.safeport.com (harbor.safeport.com [204.107.128.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9441EC9 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 04:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) by harbor.safeport.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s054YoIg061620; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 23:34:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 23:34:50 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: Warren Block Subject: Re: Xorg support question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 04:34:52 -0000 On Sat, 4 Jan 2014, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 4 Jan 2014, doug@safeport.com wrote: > >> KMS: Is this is an Intel only thing, > > No. At present on FreeBSD, Intel and ATI/AMD. > >> implemented in the video card? > > No, it just means the video card driver is in the kernel. > >> Intel driver: I assume support has passed the ironlake card by. > > I confess that the Intel codenames usually mean nothing to me. KMS Intel > drivers work on both Core2 and i3/i5 notebooks for me, and just recently KMS > Radeon drivers work on 4650 and 4850 desktop cards. > >> The question here is: Is there a way to take the output of pciconf and >> relate it to a vendor card designation? The way I read the man page for the >> Intel driver, ironlake should be supported, but it is not. > > Don't know, but it would be handy. > >> The last more general question is: Is there a way to avoid Intel graphics >> and RealteK wireless since neither seems to be on the 'to be supported' >> queue. > > Good news: most Intel graphics are supported, except for the newest Haswell > stuff (and the old, old chipset that Intel wants to forget). And more good > news, there is a driver for the newer Realtek 8188/8192: rsu(4). But I still > prefer to just put in an Atheros card when possible. Thanks Warren, I appreciate the info. _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277