From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jan 20 01:11:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA18423 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 01:11:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ache.relcom.ru (ache@ache.relcom.ru [193.125.20.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA18279; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 01:10:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@ache.relcom.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by ache.relcom.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA02538; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 12:09:42 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 12:09:41 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@ache.relcom.ru To: Dmitrij Tejblum cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru Subject: Re: amanda port, empty PATCH_STRIP= lines causes trouble In-Reply-To: <199801191817.VAA19292@yandex.hq.cti.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote: > and could find this file. New patch ignore Index: even after it couldn't find > file in ***/--- lines. This is the difference. Your words is oversimplifying of what GNU patch 2.5 does, it NOT ignore Index: completely, following patch works: Index: a @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ 1 2 -3 +2 -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/