From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 00:49:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5930716A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:49:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skippyii.compar.com (mail2.compar.com [216.208.38.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B259843D48 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:49:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from hermes (CPE00062566c7bb-CM000039c69a66.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.193.82.185])j080ukWl006527; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:56:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Message-ID: <005501c4f51b$89167910$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matt Emmerton" To: , , References: <59.1e854c16.2f1067d4@aol.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:46:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 00:49:16 -0000 > In a message dated 1/7/05 4:50:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, > sp0ng3b0b@sbcglobal.net writes: > >Given the serious stability issues that *some* users are having with > >5.3, many are sticking with 4.x for production servers. > > > >Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? Perhaps > >going into 4.12, 4.13, etc? > > > >I ask this only because I don't see a lot of communication to the list > about these issues being addressed. > > Just note that they "say" its supported, but if you want to use the latest > Intel > CPUs (800Mhz FSB Xeon64), they don't work in 4.x. Sadly noone in the > FreeBSD universe is even familiar (it seems) with new server MBs. I'd say those who are familiar are using 5.x. Maybe the time to switch is near? -- Matt Emmerton