From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 7 16:36:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8641216A41F for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:36:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: from web30310.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30310.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFAEE43D48 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:36:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 12203 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Jan 2006 16:36:43 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UwhzPQr4HtG1XL2/Kj358Rpg3xrZNYnMaciV9PNImA2/E1ho4gC6S6i4EN0AfovnHiFPV9vr7WQ33L5exVzjDG0oKuUGtxRPzcpZpmulKPjm4oLQFug3tmCsaaw8dHzw2QrRqW9WVhsT5PDG7A1ydBaUhQwq5LW8elUwC7rUy58= ; Message-ID: <20060107163643.12201.qmail@web30310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.54.77.48] by web30310.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:36:43 PST Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 08:36:43 -0800 (PST) From: Arne Woerner To: Stefan "Eßer" In-Reply-To: <20060107161111.GA42739@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xsane as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:36:44 -0000 --- Stefan Eßer wrote: > > % cat /etc/devfs.conf > > perm uscanner0 0664 > > Hmmm, why 0664? > Oh... I put myself into the operator group... I saw that too late... I hope my example still clear enough... It should have been 0666 there too. > Interesting idea to apply devfs rules from > devd ... > I did not know, what devfs is good for, so I put it into devd so that it makes sense in my setting (when I unplugged the scanner the devfs settings were lost after I re-plugged the scanner). > attach 100 { > device-name "uscanner[0-9]+"; > action "chmod 660 /dev/$device-name"; > }; > This creates uncontrolled redundancy, because then I have the perms set in devfs.conf and in devd.conf... I haven't understood the devfs/devd idea completely... :-) -Arne __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com