From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 7 21:05:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00E0106564A; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:05:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w8hdkim@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA2E8FC0C; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so641034qcs.13 for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:05:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Z3vvD0k5wldMsANZqFTrjwwZI3vuLwllvRr7dhavWz0=; b=myH3JOWPbyFFKUsZNTncxG9+Pp3cDJl6ej4E5xOm7Z6dTiF6DlzSci4IFFQGlYbMed Nj9q/BCKq/EZacUDnNj2xIYevjL2dBSQ2S+K2m/8/NQ/qcpnGXSKtKvf+kXGzUnIR4vX DUS95UUqd1wNvUpw9Y6J5ro9rg2LjcMLxkg6tNtHLx6PAZ9KmNS8mN7zXS+6EotmK8j2 3l0LcscZSoo3InHnBDVxozcHeM9UJWsrEI3xL7WmUNNVOmwBgUQe5OdoQNcN62AiQiW8 E8ZStf9Ou4XMKnn+kh81BluRqHWGbHbS5vfrXGT6Rrf7bIRGcrlhrg2zu1Byi2Bbzqpu rW0Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.137.66 with SMTP id v2mr1227773qct.82.1339103136855; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.132.12 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:05:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:05:36 -0400 Message-ID: From: Kim Culhan To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 235750 printf at 10 sec intervals X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:05:38 -0000 On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 7 June 2012 13:52, Kim Culhan wrote: > >> kernel: ath0: ath_tx_normal_setup: txq=0xffffff80007aba70 (1), pri=3, >> pri txq=0xffffff > > .. right, I gather the TXQ was truncated. > > So, I think that's some management traffic that is being thrown into > the best effort queue (txq 1) even though the net80211 stack gave it a > higher AC priority (3, voice). > > Ok, so I'm not the only person who sees that. Good. Now, how to fix > all of that nonsense up. The traffic on the link is from a voip phone which is sip registered but not in use. thanks -kim