From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  8 12:44:30 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222AF106564A
	for <openoffice@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  8 Jul 2008 12:44:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7008FC16
	for <openoffice@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  8 Jul 2008 12:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <48736130.3090400@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:44:32 +0200
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: Need for openoffice -RC ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:44:30 -0000

Hi,

Why do we still have the openoffice -RC ports?  Even one openoffice 
package puts an extreme load on the package cluster (let alone 6!), so 
I'd suggest they be disabled or removed if they are not currently 
useful.  Also perhaps one or both of the devel ports can be disabled 
until there is a significant need for it.

Thanks,
Kris