From owner-cvs-doc  Fri Sep 26 16:06:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-doc>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA05318
          for cvs-doc-outgoing; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 16:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppp1609.on.sympatico.ca (ppp1609.on.sympatico.ca [206.172.249.73])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA05286;
          Fri, 26 Sep 1997 16:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tim@localhost)
	by ppp1609.on.sympatico.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA00511;
	Fri, 26 Sep 1997 19:05:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 19:05:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Vanderhoek <tim@ppp1609.on.sympatico.ca>
Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org
To: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/handbook submitters.sgml
In-Reply-To: <199709262253.PAA20896@freefall.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970926190242.449A-100000@ppp1609.on.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 26 Sep 1997, Tim Vanderhoek wrote:

>   Modified files:
>     handbook             submitters.sgml 
>   Log:
>
>   Also, be consistent about putting <?> for unknown email addresses.

Actually, I think the few names without email addresses would look
considerably nicer if they had no email address listed than if they
had "<?>" listed.  Would anyone be upset if I changed this?


--
 tIM...HOEk
OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names
              hoping that the resultant code will run faster.