From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 13 20:53:24 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF6816A504;
	Sun, 13 Aug 2006 20:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B842B43D4C;
	Sun, 13 Aug 2006 20:53:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged))
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7DKoBMa044668;
	Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:50:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:50:22 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20060813.145022.-1398303152.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060802165604.GA970@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <20060801213803.GB9583@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20060802144255.GU69505@over-yonder.net>
	<20060802165604.GA970@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0
	(harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]);
	Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:50:12 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: deischen@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, thompsa@freebsd.org,
	fullermd@over-yonder.net
Subject: Re: Where is thr_getscheduler
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 20:53:24 -0000

In message: <20060802165604.GA970@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
            Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes:
: On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:42:55AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 02:38:03PM -0700 I heard the voice of
: > Steve Kargl, and lo! it spake thus:
: > > 
: > > If UPDATING had a proper notice,
: > 
: > If UPDATING had a notice every time a {library,program} in 7 did
: > something that wasn't supported by 6 (for various values of 7 and 6),
: > it would be a very, very long and very boring file.
: > 
: 
: Sigh. We go through this every time someone bumps libc's
: version number without bumping the version numbers of 
: all other libraries.  There is significant difference
: bewteen changing libgpib.so version number and changing
: libc.so version number.  Changeing libc's version number
: should have been noted in UPDATING.

Yes.  And we shouldn't be bumping libc in current unless we also turn
symbol versioning on at the same time...

: The version number of libthr should have been bumped
: when David Xu committed his change. 
: 
: Last time I checked there were several integers between 2 and
: INT_MAX.  Is there some sort of shortage of integers at
: freebsd.org that prevents bumping libthr.so.2 to libthr.so.3?

We do try to only bump one per major release...

Warner