Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:17:54 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: alpha@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha Message-ID: <20060321131754.k7q8g8gn40kskogo@netchild.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20060321130141.nno7zu3ogggkcw0k@netchild.homeip.net> References: <20060321002655.A4CB27304D@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060321110758.wy5mof8zeo4oowow@netchild.homeip.net> <20060321112313.GF77849@ip.net.ua> <20060321130141.nno7zu3ogggkcw0k@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote: > I don't see the reason on a quick look (with cvsweb). The more interesting > question ATM is: why did a cross-buildkernel with GENERIC succeed? It should > exhibit the same problem, shouldn't it? Never mind, I know why GENERIC doesn't break. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 no "any" key on keyboard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060321131754.k7q8g8gn40kskogo>