From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 19:42:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EA016A420 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:42:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7580F43D45 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:42:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9PJef24012827; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:40:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:40:37 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20051025.134037.33538216.imp@bsdimp.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20051025174337.GA45694@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <025401c5d953$47004480$821cfa9e@mics.msu.su> <20051025174337.GA45694@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:40:42 -0600 (MDT) Cc: mike@v.gz.ru, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: uart and puc attach conflict X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:42:17 -0000 In message: <20051025174337.GA45694@xor.obsecurity.org> Kris Kennaway writes: : On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:00:14PM +0400, Mike G wrote: : > Hello! : > : > I have a problem with multi-port card based on Nm9845 chip. : > It's a card with 4 com-ports. : > It perfectly works with puc(4) and sio(4) drivers if they compiled into : > kernel. : > or with puc(4) and uart(4) drivers if they loaded manualy. : > But if puc(4) and uart(4) are compiled into kernel or loaded from : > loader.conf - problem appears. : : Isn't puc superceded by uart? Why do you need both? No. puc isn't superceded by uart. Warner