From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 14 06:01:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F57816A4B3; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 06:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from verifam.don.to (verifam.don.to [202.221.217.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1420343F85; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 06:01:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by verifam.don.to (8.12.9p2/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h9ED1GSL006912; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:01:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp) To: scott@sremick.net From: sumikawa@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <20031003.101518.846944044.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <20031009230531.6ef070f2.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20031014220115G.sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:01:15 +0900 (JST) Sender: SUMIKAWA Munechika (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCM1FAbj0hNmEbKEI=?=) X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 13 cc: sumikawa@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do repocopy for OpenOffice.org on this weekend (2003/Oct/4 or5) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:01:18 -0000 Nakata-san, > From: > /usr/ports/chinese/openoffice-zh_CN > (snip) > to > /usr/ports/chinese/openoffice1.0-zh_CN > (snip) Do we have any strong reason that we must keep the port of version 1.0? My suggestion is we just upgrade editors/openoffice to 1.1.0. -- Sumikawa