From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jan 18 14:03:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA17739 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 14:03:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from wopr.inetu.net (wopr.inetu.net [207.18.13.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA17735 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 14:03:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dev@wopr.inetu.net) Received: from localhost (dev@localhost) by wopr.inetu.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA26454; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 17:13:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 17:13:09 -0500 (EST) From: Dev Chanchani To: Lists cc: "Daniel O'Callaghan" , Joe Mays , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Distributed Webservers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org One of my friends (another IPP) finally folded and got Windows NT/4 for frontpage purposes. And it turned it frontpage is still just as flakey on NT :-) Regarding distrubted web servers: Has anyone here had expierence with round-robin DNS? Why not just setup a Server with a Raid Array/NFS Server, then have clients mount the drives and load balance through round-robin DNS? I have another friend who told me sometime ago about this, I will touch base with them.. Dev Chanchani - INetU, Inc.(tm) - http://www.INetU.net Electronic commerce - Web development - Web hosting dev@INetU.net - Phone: (610) 266-7441 On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Lists wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Joe Mays wrote: > > > > > What are the favored methods for running distributed > > > load-balancing webservers here? > > > > How many hits per minute are you wanting? Is this for many virtual > > sites, or another Yahoo! ? > > > > > Also, has anyone managed to come up with a good solution for > > > sharing customer websites between NT and FreeBSD servers? > > > > Shoot the customer who wants to use NT - puts 'em out of your misery. > > I don't understand why a customer would need NT unless they needed > Frontpage extensions, which 1. are crap and 2. are available on > UN*X anyway! > > Any other reasons? > > L8rz > > KrOnUs >