Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:00:41 +0100
From:      Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz>
To:        Rick Updegrove <dislists@updegrove.net>
Cc:        freebsd@simplerezo.com
Subject:   Re: RE : qmail-scanner really out of date
Message-ID:  <20040322190041.GA11372@isis.wad.cz>
In-Reply-To: <405F2E2A.9000208@updegrove.net>
References:  <000801c41011$1e22ebb0$9701a8c0@MOETINB> <405F2E2A.9000208@updegrove.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# dislists@updegrove.net / 2004-03-22 10:19:22 -0800:

> Two more requests.  Can we NOT hard code this?
> 
> +QMAILSCAN_NOTIFY?=	psender,recips
> 
> Instead, please make it an option along with:
> 
> .if defined(QMAILSCAN_SPAMARCHIVE)
> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=    --archive yes
> .endif

    Jumping in from the middle of nowhere, stepping on everyone's toes:

    "?=" (notice the question mark) is "conditional assignment", IOW,

    QMAILSCAN_NOTIFY?=	psender,recips

    is the same as

    .if !defined(QMAILSCAN_NOTIFY)
    QMAILSCAN_NOTIFY=	psender,recips
    .endif

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040322190041.GA11372>