From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 19 19:18:37 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA11950 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 19:18:37 -0700 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA11940 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 19:18:25 -0700 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA22834 (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for hackers@freebsd.org); Tue, 19 Sep 1995 21:02:52 -0500 Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA14233; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 21:01:14 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 21:01:14 -0500 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Message-Id: <199509200201.VAA14233@bonkers.taronga.com> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Coding style ( was Re: why is this not a bug in namei?) Newsgroups: taronga.freebsd.hackers In-Reply-To: <199509191852.LAA10314@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199509190433.WAA24091@rocky.sri.MT.net> Organization: Taronga Park BBS Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk While I'm no fan of excessive gotos, or excessive goto avoidance... In article <199509191852.LAA10314@phaeton.artisoft.com>, Terry Lambert wrote: >> > According to a Bell Labs study, human beings are capable of keeping 5 to >> > 9 items in short term memory simultaneously. That would be why phone >> > numbers are 7 digits. >> > I'm not even taxing the low end of the study participants. >> What this has to do with you using goto's I have no idea. >It shows that David's complaint about 3 goto's is religious, and not as >he said a result of battling obfuscation. Um, those three gotos aren't "three things you have to remember", but rather "three *more* things you have to remember". If you're already dealing with four arguments, a function name, and a macro you just blew it.