From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 16:12:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F09106564A for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112908FC18 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from prawn.unsane.co.uk (150.117-84-212.staticip.namesco.net [212.84.117.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m52GC84c057219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:12:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <48441C03.3000209@unsane.co.uk> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:12:51 +0100 From: Vince Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080514) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <81a9e3840806020555x10a91337n11e678c5dc6cffff@mail.gmail.com> <81a9e3840806020642k4017db9chb8c0ba3821466582@mail.gmail.com> <4843FF87.4070308@unsane.co.uk> <18500.704.941947.361128@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <18500.704.941947.361128@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jyun-Yi Liou <7yuny1@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnash leave a blank page when visit youtube X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:12:54 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > Vince Hoffman writes: > >> > Is there any way to avoid RESTRICTED and install www/linux-flashplugin7 ? >> > www/linux-flashplugin9 always freeze my firefox :-( >> >> For me the >> RESTRICTED= Redistribution not allowed >> line just means what it says, ie you cant redistribute the >> port/package. > > If that's the case, then it's a poor choice if name for the > variable. > It seems clear enough to me but I can see why it could cause confusion. For an explanation of what the variables mean its usually best to look though the porters handbook. Taking this as an example: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-restrictions.html > > Robert Huff